Bush vs. Kerry


Quite right, they are not that different, these two. They both want your money and they both want to spend it.. they just want to funnel our cash to different end-games and corporate sponsors. The biggest selling point for me to vote "no" on Bush tomorrow is that at least Kerry will have an opposed legilative branch to veto his rediculous budgetary ideas whereas Dub has gotten the green light on a Carlyle/Halliburton spending spree thus far.

Boy, can't wait to see what kind of clusterfuck feeding frenzy this Florida mess is going to be this week. Let's hope the victory is secured without Jeb's state being needed and thereby able to buy another election for brother Dub.

BTW.. you are ab-so-frigging-lutely correct about the folks REALLY in control of the white house. I dunno if you fellas have already been through this or not, but all you have to do is look up the PNAC think tank and take a look at the membership list pre-2000 and compare it to administrative positions held (beginning with the Veep himself) currently. I found it oh so suprising (or not) that the PNAC think tank wrote several letters/papers submitted to Clinton and other senators in the previous decade practically begging for an invasion of Iraq and what do you know? Hey! Let's blur the line between "terrorism" and "Saddam is a bad guy" and that way we can parlay the approved fundage for "war on terror" into our "war on Saddam".

**insert picture of raging hard on here**

Anyway.. don't get me started. Hehe. I'm not voting for Kerry, and I don't think most people are that are voting for him... we're all voting "NO" on referendum-Dub04. Kerry is just marginally electible than anything else. I particularly can't stand Edwards.. like almost so much that I'd rather see Bush in office for four more years if you can believe it. I wouldn't shed a single freaking tear to see that guy stumble into traffic and get smooshed flat.

Late,

~O.